How Stereotypes Impact Our Social Interactions

Stereotypes are generalizations about groups of people that allow us to quickly judge individuals without having to spend a lot of time getting to know them. This ability for rapid categorization likely carried evolutionary advantages, aiding our ancestors in efficiently navigating their environments and making swift decisions.

However, over-reliance on stereotypes can prove problematic when they do not align with the actual characteristics or behaviors of the person we are interacting with. For example, a teacher’s didactic tone may come across as patronizing when it turns out that the young person being spoken to is also an educator rather than a student.

Yet our current scientific understanding of how stereotypes truly shape our social interactions, particularly in the face of contradictory evidence, remains limited. This understanding is needed if we want to address the biases associated with stereotypes and foster a more inclusive and equitable society.

Interaction Games

A new line of research is shedding light on this matter. At the heart of this research lies the recognition that computer-mediated interaction games offer a unique toolset. Because study participants cannot see or hear one another during gameplay, researchers can experimentally alter individuals’ beliefs about their interaction partners. This enables subsequent assessment of participants’ tendencies to behave in accordance with those preconceived beliefs.

To illustrate this idea, researchers can design a game where participants interact with two distinct partners: a 5-year-old child and an adult. The twist is that both of these ‘roles’ are performed by the same individual, who remains unaware of which role they are assuming in each interaction. This setup ensures that any perceived disparities between the child and adult partners are solely attributable to the participants’ stereotype-driven beliefs about their capabilities, rather than actual differences in behavior and understanding between the two partners.

Previous research using this experimental setup has shown that participants instinctively make subtle adaptations when they believe they are interacting with the ‘child’ partner. Much like how we naturally modify our communication style with children by adjusting the tone and inflection of our voice, participants in these games tend to place more emphasis on important portions of the digital game board when engaged with the presumed child partner.

Sources of Individual Variation

Interaction games thus present a promising avenue for capturing the behavioral effects of stereotypes in a controlled and systematic manner. This enables researchers to explore whether individuals vary in their capacity or propensity to utilize preconceived notions about people during their social interactions.

A study aimed at addressing this question investigated patients with prefrontal lobe damage, a brain region situated above the eyes that is known for its involvement in social behavior. The findings of this study revealed that patients with prefrontal damage did not demonstrate slower or clearer behaviors while engaging with the presumed child partner. This discovery highlights the crucial role of the prefrontal lobe in shaping individuals’ responses to stereotype-related cues within social interactions.

In a separate study, researchers examined whether the development of this social ability is influenced by environmental factors, such as socioeconomic status and the extent of exposure to social interactions within and outside the family setting. The study specifically targeted 5-year-old children, as this age is known for well-developed social skills and allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the child’s social environment.

Bias Essential Reads

Women Without Children Still Face a "Motherhood Penalty"

Are You Blind to Subtle Forms of Workplace Discrimination?

The study revealed a significant relationship between the amount of time children spent in daycare (days per week) from birth until the age of 4 and the extent to which they spontaneously organized their interactive behaviors according to their beliefs about their partner at age 5. These initial insights shed light on the factors that contribute to individual variations in this crucial aspect of human interaction.

A Sensitive Developmental Period

The study involving 5-year-old children offers evidence supporting the longstanding notion that our ability to interact with others develops through social interactions. However, it remains unclear whether the consequences of social experiences acquired in a daycare environment extend beyond early development.

Humans differ from other primates in both the extent and nature of social interactions encountered from early infancy. Unlike chimpanzee infants, who typically remain under their mother’s care until around 5 years old, human infants are regularly exposed to interactions with a variety of individuals from an early stage. This striking contrast has prompted anthropologists to propose that these early-life social experiences may play a crucial role in the development of human interactional abilities that endure into adulthood.

A rare opportunity presented itself to investigate a unique cohort of 17-year-old adolescents who had been meticulously tracked since infancy. These individuals had consistently reported their social statistics annually, including details such as the number of friends and or siblings they had, the extent of time spent with them, and notably, the amount of time they had spent in daycare during their earliest years.

By acquiring participants’ brain scans and employing the same interaction game utilized in the aforementioned studies, this investigation yielded two insights. First, the study identified a specific sub-region within the prefrontal lobe known as the anterior cingulate gyrus, which remarkably predicted an individual’s tendency to act in accordance with stereotypes associated with their interaction partners. This finding aligns with previous observations of impaired adaptation in patients with prefrontal damage encompassing the anterior cingulate gyrus.

Second, participants who had a long history of daycare exposure demonstrated a heightened capacity to adapt their communication style to match the actual behavior and understanding of both child and adult partners. These individuals treated both partners equally and showed reduced reliance on stereotypes as they gathered interaction-based evidence against their preconceived assumptions about their partners.

In conclusion, these observations highlight the important role of interaction-based evidence in shaping the impact of stereotypes. Our ability to align the influence of stereotypes with evidence derived from social interactions develops through engagement in social interactions, particularly in early life.

By the same token, these findings underscore the real-world significance of utilizing interaction games as research tools, highlighting the importance of studying stereotype beliefs within the context of live social interactions, where they matter most.