Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Bias

Bridging Divides: Understanding and Overcoming "Othering"

Unraveling the fabric of othering for an inclusive and empathetic world.

Key points

  • Othering's roots in history deepen modern societal divisions.
  • Education is vital in dismantling the pervasive walls of prejudice.
  • Policies play a crucial role in promoting an inclusive society.
  • Empathy and understanding are key to countering the effects of othering.

Imagine a world where differences are not sources of division but threads woven into a vibrant tapestry of human experience. This is the antithesis of "othering," a pervasive psychological mechanism that creates artificial dividing lines, categorizing individuals or groups as "different" or "not one of us" (Sue et al., 2007). The consequences of othering are far-reaching, fueling prejudice, discrimination, and even violence. In this critical juncture of our society, marked by increasing fragmentation and conflict, understanding and dismantling othering is no longer an academic pursuit but a societal imperative.

Historical Echoes: The Persistent Shadow of Othering

Othering is not a contemporary anomaly but a historical constant that has profoundly shaped societies and cultures. Differences in language, culture, and appearance have been weaponized to justify exclusion and oppression. The chilling legacies of colonialism and slavery stand as stark reminders of the long-term consequences of othering. Pioneering scholars like Edward Said, Frantz Fanon, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak have illuminated how othering underpins systemic forms of oppression (Said, 1978; Fanon, 1963; Spivak, 1988), laying bare the persistent divide between "us" and "them."

A Catalyst for Devastation: Othering in Conflict and War

Nowhere is the destructive power of othering more evident than in the fiery crucible of conflict and war. By dehumanizing the enemy, painting them as a monolithic threat to our safety and values, othering transforms war into a righteous crusade, justifying unimaginable acts of violence (Halperin, 2016). The devastating wars in Syria and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict stand as tragic examples of how othering can escalate tensions and impede the path to peace (Hassan, 2018). Individual accounts from these conflicts reveal the heartbreaking cost of othering, turning neighbors into adversaries, and extinguishing the embers of compassion.

The Inner Turmoil: Psychological Implications of Othering

The tentacles of othering reach far beyond the battlefield, ensnaring individuals in a web of psychological turmoil. One insidious manifestation is imposter syndrome, where individuals, particularly those from marginalized groups, doubt their achievements and feel like outsiders due to internalized messages of otherness (Clance & Imes, 1978). Neurologically, othering impacts cognitive processes and biases, shaping how individuals perceive themselves and their place in society.

Dismantling Othering: Pathways to Integration and Compassion

Combating othering requires a multi-pronged approach, one that fosters human integration and cultivates the seeds of compassion. Education plays a crucial role in dismantling the walls of prejudice. Exposing individuals to diverse perspectives, fostering intercultural dialogue, and promoting critical thinking can chip away at ingrained biases and cultivate empathy (Todd et al., 2011). Initiatives like "Not In Our Town" demonstrate the power of collective action in promoting inclusion and standing up to discrimination (O'Neill, 1995).

Community and Policy: Crafting an Inclusive Future

Community initiatives, however, are only one piece of the puzzle. Policy changes are essential to dismantle institutionalized othering. Reforming hiring practices, implementing bias training in workplaces, and addressing systemic inequalities are crucial steps toward creating a more equitable society. Governments have a responsibility to enact policies that uphold the dignity and rights of all individuals, regardless of their background or identity.

Conclusion: A Clarion Call to Action

Understanding and countering othering is not just an academic exercise; it is a moral imperative, a call to action for every individual and institution. The journey will be challenging, demanding constant vigilance and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths. But within the struggle lies the promise of a future where diversity is not just tolerated but celebrated, where every individual feels valued and connected, and where the tapestry of human experience is woven with threads of empathy, acceptance, and understanding. Let us commit to unraveling the fabric of othering, stitch by stitch, and forge a more inclusive and compassionate world for all.

References

Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241.

Fanon, F. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press.

Halperin, E. (2016). Emotion, emotion regulation, and conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 8(1), 70-76.

Hassan, G. (2018). Syria @ War: From the Syrian Revolution to the Fragmentation of the Levant. The Arab Reform Initiative.

O'Neill, P. (1995). Not In Our Town. PBS.

Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press.

Sue, D. W., et al. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271.

Todd, A. R., et al. (2011). Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1027.

Weng, H. Y., et al. (2013). Compassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1171-1180.

advertisement
More from Felipe Mercado Ed.D, MSW
More from Psychology Today