Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Attachment

Navigating Attachment Styles in Therapy

This therapist's guide helps navigate attachment styles in therapy.

Key points

  • Attachment styles need to be considered in therapy.
  • When therapists adapt their approach, it enhances treatment outcomes and the therapeutic alliance.
  • The therapeutic relationship itself can be a model for healthy attachment.
Source: Alex Green/Pexels
Source: Alex Green/Pexels

The interplay between early attachment experiences and adult relational patterns is fundamental to psychological theory and practice. Understanding a client's attachment style—rooted in the pioneering work of John Bowlby (1969) on attachment theory and further elaborated by Mary Ainsworth through her development of the "strange situation"—provides a lens through which we can interpret their interpersonal behaviors, emotional regulation, and coping strategies. This knowledge informs our therapeutic approach and deepens the therapeutic alliance, a critical component of effective therapy.

Attachment Styles and Their Impact on Therapy

  • Secure Attachment: Individuals with a secure attachment style are generally characterized by having greater resilience, emotional flexibility, and openness in relationships (Ainsworth et al., 1978). They tend to engage more readily in therapy, exhibit trust toward the therapist, and actively participate in the therapeutic process. However, their lower overall levels of psychopathology mean they are less likely to seek therapy.
  • Anxious-Preoccupied Attachment: Characterised by high levels of anxiety and preoccupation with relationships, individuals with this attachment style may seek constant reassurance in therapy, reflecting their fears of abandonment and rejection (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). It is helpful to consider that "anxiously attached" clients may, at times, struggle to use therapy productively due to their preoccupation. Clinicians can help by creating a structured and consistent environment that teaches clients they no longer need to amplify distress signals to get their needs met.
  • Dismissive-Avoidant Attachment: These individuals prioritize self-reliance and have learned to turn away from internal distress (Main, 1996). Establishing rapport and seeing progress takes time in therapy. Psychologists should focus on providing empathic responses, building emotional attunement, and teaching clients that it is safe to feel and express their emotions.
  • Fearful-Avoidant (Disorganised) Attachment: Marked by ambivalence and inconsistency, often stemming from trauma or severe neglect (Main & Solomon, 1990). These clients may fluctuate between being emotionally distant to overly anxious, and understanding their complex needs is crucial for effective therapy.

Clinical Implications and Adaptations in Therapy

The client's and therapist's attachment styles can significantly influence the formation of the therapeutic alliance. Psychologists should consider their attachment styles and develop an awareness of their attachment patterns to prevent these from interfering with therapy. Holmes (2015) emphasizes the importance of therapists being attuned to their attachment styles to prevent potential biases and countertransference issues from clouding the therapeutic process.

Clients' attachment styles can activate specific transference and countertransference patterns, and continued reflective practice, supervision, and personal therapy can assist in managing this dynamic interplay of attachment styles (Daniel, 2015).

The clinician's ability to adapt their therapeutic stance in response to a client's attachment style is fundamental for fostering a positive therapeutic outcome. For clients with an anxious-preoccupied attachment style, integrating techniques from cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) can be particularly effective.

Levy et al. (2018) highlight the utility of CBT in modifying the maladaptive beliefs about self-worth and fear of abandonment, while DBT's emphasis on mindfulness and emotional regulation can provide anxious-preoccupied clients with practical tools for managing anxiety and enhancing self-esteem.

Enhancing emotional attunement is a key therapeutic goal, especially for clients with insecure attachment styles. Acknowledge and respect their need for independence and control and ensure you work at their pace. Empower avoidantly attached clients by involving them in treatment planning and decision-making processes, reinforcing their sense of control and autonomy. Collaborate on setting personal goals that align with their values and interests. Therapy may need to focus on helping the avoidant client learn to identify, label, and experience their emotions and learn that it is safe to do so.

Clients with fearful-avoidant (disorganized) attachment styles present unique therapeutic challenges, often stemming from early trauma or neglect. Trauma-informed approaches that incorporate safety, empowerment, and trustworthiness principles are essential (Courtois & Ford, 2016). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and trauma-focused CBT are among the evidence-based treatments that can help clients process and integrate traumatic memories, reducing the disorganization and emotional volatility associated with this attachment style (Shapiro, 2018).

Conclusion

Incorporating a deep understanding of attachment theory into adult psychotherapy enriches the therapeutic process, enabling clinicians to tailor their approaches to meet their clients' specific needs and vulnerabilities. By aligning our therapeutic approaches with clients' attachment styles, we not only enhance the effectiveness of therapy but also support our clients in forging more fulfilling and secure relational patterns in their lives.

Psychologists can use the therapeutic relationship as a model for healthy attachment, demonstrating how relationships can be safe spaces for vulnerability and emotional sharing. As clinicians, our commitment to ongoing learning and adaptation in this area is essential, ensuring that we remain responsive and attuned to the diverse needs of those we serve.

To find a therapist, please visit the Psychology Today Therapy Directory.

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Volume I. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

Courtois, C. A., & Ford, J. D. (2016). Treatment of complex trauma: A sequenced, relationship-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Daniel, S. I. F. (2015). Adult attachment patterns and individual psychotherapy: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 6-16.

Holmes, J. (2015). Attachment: Towards a secure therapeutic alliance. Cambridge University Press.

Levy, K. N., Ellison, W. D., Scott, L. N., & Bernecker, S. L. (2018). Attachment style. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(9), 1587-1607.

Main, M. (1996). Introduction to the special section on attachment and psychopathology: 2. Overview of the field of attachment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(2), 237-243.

Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 121-160). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.

Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy, third edition: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures. Guilford Press.

advertisement
More from Amanda Moses B S.Sc
More from Psychology Today